Armenia vs Treviso: Climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – Cities and FUAs

Armenia
1.33 Degrees celsius
in 2060
Treviso
2.19 Degrees celsius
in 2060
Armenia rank
2nd
Treviso rank
4th

Climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – Cities and FUAs over time

  • Armenia
  • Treviso
00.511.52203020452060

How they compare

Treviso currently reports 2.19 Degrees celsius against 1.33 Degrees celsius in Armenia, a difference of 0.86 Degrees celsius.

That makes Treviso's figure about 1.6 times Armenia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Treviso has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 2nd and Treviso ranks 4th of 2 countries.

Treviso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Treviso Difference Ahead
2030s 0.9794 Degrees celsius 1.51 Degrees celsius 0.5353 Degrees celsius Treviso
2040s 1.18 Degrees celsius 1.86 Degrees celsius 0.6793 Degrees celsius Treviso
2050s 1.31 Degrees celsius 2 Degrees celsius 0.6972 Degrees celsius Treviso
2060s 1.33 Degrees celsius 2.19 Degrees celsius 0.8579 Degrees celsius Treviso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – cities and fuas, Armenia or Treviso?
Treviso, at 2.19 Degrees celsius against 1.33 Degrees celsius in Armenia as of 2060.
What is the difference in climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – cities and fuas between Armenia and Treviso?
0.86 Degrees celsius, with Treviso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Treviso?
31 years are reported by both, from 2030 to 2060.
How do Armenia and Treviso rank globally for climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – cities and fuas?
Armenia ranks 2nd and Treviso ranks 4th of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – Cities and FUAs — Projected air temperature change compared to 1981-2010 average. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Treviso: Climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – Cities and FUAs. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/climate-projections-by-scenario-2030-2060-cities-and-fuas-projected-air-temperature-2/armenia/treviso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/climate-projections-by-scenario-2030-2060-cities-and-fuas-projected-air-temperature-2/armenia/treviso/">Armenia vs Treviso: Climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – Cities and FUAs</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Climate projections by scenario, 2030–2060 – Cities and FUAs — Projected air temperature change compared to 1981-2010 average
Unit
Degrees celsius
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,374 places, 42,594 data points, 2030–2060
Last refreshed

This dataset provides sub-national indicators on 2030-2060 projections by scenario on air temperature, hot days, icing days, tropical nights, total precipitation and extreme precipitation days in FUAs and Cities. Data sources and methodology Projections are based on NASA NEX-GDDP CMIP6 data, which provides average air temperature projections at a 0.25° spatial resolution for different scenarios - Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). Hot days refer to days during which the maximum temperature is higher than 35°C) Tropical nights refer to nights during which the minimum temperature is higher than 20°C. Icing days are defined as days during which the maximum temperature is lower than 0°C. Extreme precipitation days are defined as days during which the total precipitation is higher than 20 mm. SSPs are climate scenarios up to 2100 that model how socio‑economic factors may change over the next century. These scenarios are combined with Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), which outline different greenhouse gas (GHG) concentration levels and their radiative forcings. Radiative forcing quantifies how factors like GHGs, aerosols and solar changes affect Earth’s atmospheric energy balance. This dataset covers highlights four scenarios: SSP1-2.6: Sustainability. 2.6 watts per square metre (W/m2) radiative forcing, 1.8°C warming by 2100. SSP2-4.5: Middle-of-the-road. 4.5 W/m2 radiative forcing, 2.7°C warming by 2100. SSP3-7.0: Regional rivalry. 7.0 W/m2 radiative forcing, 3.6°C warming by 2100. SSP5-8.5: Fossil fuel development. 8.5 W/m2 radiative forcing, 4.4°C warming by 2100. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The definition identifies 1 285 FUAs and 1 402 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Climate projections by scenario, 2030-2060 – Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org