Antigua and Barbuda vs Belarus: Climate related disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable) … gaps
Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2017
Belarus
1
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
78th
Belarus rank
78th
Climate related disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable) … gaps over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Belarus
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in Belarus, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 78th and Belarus ranks 78th of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.2 | 1 | 0.2 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher climate related disasters frequency, number of disasters: total, Antigua and Barbuda or Belarus?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in Belarus as of 2017.
- What is the difference in climate related disasters frequency, number of disasters: total between Antigua and Barbuda and Belarus?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Belarus?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Belarus rank globally for climate related disasters frequency, number of disasters: total?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 78th and Belarus ranks 78th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Climate related disasters frequency, Number of Disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Climate related disasters frequency, Number of Disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable) with 1,354 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.