Serbia and Montenegro vs Nigeria: Climate related disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable) … gaps
Serbia and Montenegro
3
in 2006
Nigeria
3
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
30th
Nigeria rank
30th
Climate related disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable) … gaps over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Nigeria
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 3 against 3 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Nigeria ahead.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 30th and Nigeria ranks 30th of 183 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1 | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 2.21 | 3.57 | 1.36 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher climate related disasters frequency, number of disasters: total, Serbia and Montenegro or Nigeria?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 3 against 3 in Nigeria as of 2006.
- What is the difference in climate related disasters frequency, number of disasters: total between Serbia and Montenegro and Nigeria?
- 0, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Nigeria?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2006.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Nigeria rank globally for climate related disasters frequency, number of disasters: total?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 30th and Nigeria ranks 30th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Climate related disasters frequency, Number of Disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Climate related disasters frequency, Number of Disasters: TOTAL, Number (Not Applicable) with 1,354 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.