Congo vs Eswatini: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)

Congo
100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini
103.57 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
22nd
Eswatini rank
21st

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 103.57 % change on previous year against 100 % change on previous year in Congo, a difference of 3.57 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Congo ranks 22nd and Eswatini ranks 21st of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 25.38 % change on previous year 56.5 % change on previous year 31.12 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 0.3184 % change on previous year 142.38 % change on previous year 142.06 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 59.03 % change on previous year 106.75 % change on previous year 47.72 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 53.33 % change on previous year 28.01 % change on previous year 25.32 % change on previous year Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Congo or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 103.57 % change on previous year against 100 % change on previous year in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Congo and Eswatini?
3.57 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 22nd and Eswatini ranks 21st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 4,247 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.