Costa Rica vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)

Costa Rica
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Costa Rica rank
54th
Iceland rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Iceland
-2000200400600199119962001

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Iceland ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 54th and Iceland ranks 54th of 169 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 46.78 % change on previous year 65.31 % change on previous year 18.53 % change on previous year Iceland
2000s 35.37 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 85.37 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Costa Rica or Iceland?
Costa Rica, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Costa Rica and Iceland?
0 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Iceland?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Costa Rica and Iceland rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 54th and Iceland ranks 54th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/iceland/">Costa Rica vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 4,247 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.