Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
236.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation
236.57 % change on previous year
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
8th
Russian Federation rank
7th

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Russian Federation
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 236.57 % change on previous year against 236.38 % change on previous year in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 0.19 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 47.97 % change on previous year 60.06 % change on previous year 12.09 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2000s -30.04 % change on previous year 73.26 % change on previous year 103.3 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s 67.58 % change on previous year 143.19 % change on previous year 75.6 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s 64.54 % change on previous year 48.68 % change on previous year 15.86 % change on previous year Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 236.57 % change on previous year against 236.38 % change on previous year in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation?
0.19 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 7th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/russian-federation-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 4,247 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.