Greenland vs Melanesia: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Melanesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Greenland rank
54th
Melanesia rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Greenland
- Melanesia
How they compare
Greenland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Melanesia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 54th and Melanesia ranks 54th of 169 countries.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Greenland or Melanesia?
- Greenland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Melanesia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Greenland and Melanesia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Melanesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Greenland and Melanesia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Greenland ranks 54th and Melanesia ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.