Greenland vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Greenland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Papua New Guinea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Greenland rank
54th
Papua New Guinea rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Greenland
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Greenland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 54th and Papua New Guinea ranks 54th of 169 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Greenland or Papua New Guinea?
- Greenland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Greenland and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Greenland and Papua New Guinea rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Greenland ranks 54th and Papua New Guinea ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.