Libya vs Samoa: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Samoa
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Libya rank
54th
Samoa rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Libya
- Samoa
How they compare
Libya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Samoa, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Samoa ahead.
Libya ranks 54th and Samoa ranks 54th of 169 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Libya or Samoa?
- Libya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Samoa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Libya and Samoa?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Samoa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Libya and Samoa rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Libya ranks 54th and Samoa ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.