New Caledonia vs Sweden: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
New Caledonia rank
54th
Sweden rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- New Caledonia
- Sweden
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 54th of 169 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, New Caledonia or Sweden?
- New Caledonia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2022.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between New Caledonia and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do New Caledonia and Sweden rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- New Caledonia ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.