Sri Lanka vs Sweden: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Sri Lanka rank
54th
Sweden rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sweden
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 54th of 169 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Sri Lanka or Sweden?
- Sri Lanka, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2001.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Sri Lanka and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sweden rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Sri Lanka ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.