Sweden vs United Republic of Tanzania: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area)
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
United Republic of Tanzania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden rank
54th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
54th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate (Area) over time
- Sweden
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 54th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 54th of 169 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate, Sweden or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 1999.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate between Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Sweden and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Sweden ranks 54th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 54th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.