Belarus vs New Zealand: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Belarus
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
56th
New Zealand rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- New Zealand
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 119.07 ha | 21.15 ha | 97.92 ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 5.69 ha | 9.11 ha | 3.42 ha | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Belarus or New Zealand?
- Belarus, at 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Belarus and New Zealand?
- 0 ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.