Bhutan vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Bhutan
0 ha
in 2024
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Bhutan rank
56th
Norway rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Bhutan
- Norway
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
Bhutan ranks 56th and Norway ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 113.67 ha | 763.85 ha | 650.19 ha | Norway |
| 2000s | 10.22 ha | 3.22 ha | 7 ha | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Bhutan or Norway?
- Bhutan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Bhutan and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Norway rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Bhutan ranks 56th and Norway ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.