Chile vs Malawi: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Chile
600.93 ha
in 2024
Malawi
534.6 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
33rd
Malawi rank
34th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Malawi
How they compare
Chile currently reports 600.93 ha against 534.6 ha in Malawi, a difference of 66.33 ha.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 34th of 219 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,376 ha | 1,960 ha | 3,416 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 2,450 ha | 809.15 ha | 1,641 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 3,849 ha | 260.89 ha | 3,588 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 2,605 ha | 372.08 ha | 2,233 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Chile or Malawi?
- Chile, at 600.93 ha against 534.6 ha in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Chile and Malawi?
- 66.33 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Malawi rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Chile ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 34th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.