China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Georgia
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
56th
Georgia rank
56th

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Georgia
05001.0k1.5k199020072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Georgia, a difference of 0 ha.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Georgia ranks 56th of 219 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 28.4 ha 400.46 ha 372.06 ha Georgia
2000s 0.1596 ha 16.65 ha 16.49 ha Georgia
2010s 0 ha 17.2 ha 17.2 ha Georgia
2020s 0 ha 0 ha 0 ha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, China, Hong Kong SAR or Georgia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Georgia as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia?
0 ha, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Georgia ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/georgia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.