Ecuador vs Serbia and Montenegro: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Ecuador
21.37 ha
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 ha
in 2005
Ecuador rank
55th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 55th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 242.33 ha | 56.21 ha | 186.13 ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 135.27 ha | 7.69 ha | 127.58 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Ecuador or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Ecuador, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 21.37 ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 55th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.