Eswatini vs Peru: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Eswatini
1,221 ha
in 2024
Peru
2,182 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
27th
Peru rank
26th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 2,182 ha against 1,221 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 961 ha.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.8 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 27th and Peru ranks 26th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,513 ha | 3,762 ha | 1,249 ha | Peru |
| 2000s | 5,600 ha | 289.83 ha | 5,310 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 3,098 ha | 731.45 ha | 2,367 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 732.86 ha | 1,339 ha | 606.19 ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Eswatini or Peru?
- Peru, at 2,182 ha against 1,221 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Eswatini and Peru?
- 961 ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Peru rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 27th and Peru ranks 26th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.