French Guiana vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
French Guiana
0 ha
in 2024
Iceland
0 ha
in 2024
French Guiana rank
56th
Iceland rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- French Guiana
- Iceland
How they compare
French Guiana currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Iceland, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
French Guiana ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Guiana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.16 ha | 13.77 ha | 6.61 ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.195 ha | 2.55 ha | 2.36 ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, French Guiana or Iceland?
- French Guiana, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between French Guiana and Iceland?
- 0 ha, with French Guiana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Iceland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do French Guiana and Iceland rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- French Guiana ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.