Georgia vs New Zealand: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Georgia
0 ha
in 2024
New Zealand
0 ha
in 2024
Georgia rank
56th
New Zealand rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Georgia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 400.46 ha | 21.15 ha | 379.32 ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 16.65 ha | 9.11 ha | 7.54 ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 17.2 ha | 0 ha | 17.2 ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Georgia or New Zealand?
- Georgia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Georgia and New Zealand?
- 0 ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and New Zealand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and New Zealand rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Georgia ranks 56th and New Zealand ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.