Greenland vs Libya: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Greenland
0 ha
in 2024
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Greenland rank
56th
Libya rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Greenland
- Libya
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Greenland ranks 56th and Libya ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.16 ha | 143.78 ha | 136.63 ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 6.44 ha | 6.44 ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 34.59 ha | 143.73 ha | 109.15 ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 77.23 ha | 77.23 ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Greenland or Libya?
- Greenland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Greenland and Libya?
- 0 ha, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Libya rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Greenland ranks 56th and Libya ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.