Iceland vs Kuwait: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Iceland
0 ha
in 2024
Kuwait
0 ha
in 2024
Iceland rank
56th
Kuwait rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Iceland
- Kuwait
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Kuwait, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 56th and Kuwait ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Kuwait in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.77 ha | 0.4436 ha | 13.33 ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 2.55 ha | 0 ha | 2.55 ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.29 ha | 4.29 ha | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Iceland or Kuwait?
- Iceland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Kuwait as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Iceland and Kuwait?
- 0 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kuwait?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Kuwait rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Iceland ranks 56th and Kuwait ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.