Libya vs Uganda: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Libya rank
56th
Uganda rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Libya
- Uganda
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Libya ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 143.78 ha | 35,520 ha | 35,376 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 6.44 ha | 2,710 ha | 2,703 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 143.73 ha | 23.51 ha | 120.23 ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 77.23 ha | 8.55 ha | 68.68 ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Libya or Uganda?
- Libya, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Libya and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Uganda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Libya ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.