Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mozambique: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
153,953 ha
in 2024
Mozambique
21,733 ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th
Mozambique rank
13th

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Mozambique
02.0M4.0M6.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 153,953 ha against 21,733 ha in Mozambique, a difference of 132,220 ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 7.1 times Mozambique's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Mozambique ranks 13th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 2.40 million ha 66,824 ha 2.33 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 936,450 ha 60,795 ha 875,655 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 210,848 ha 33,143 ha 177,705 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 114,828 ha 16,723 ha 98,105 ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Mozambique?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 153,953 ha against 21,733 ha in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mozambique?
132,220 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mozambique?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mozambique rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Mozambique ranks 13th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mozambique: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/mozambique/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mozambique: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.