North Macedonia vs Uganda: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
North Macedonia
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
56th
Uganda rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- North Macedonia
- Uganda
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.39 ha | 41,280 ha | 41,224 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 16.27 ha | 2,710 ha | 2,693 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 23.51 ha | 23.51 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, North Macedonia or Uganda?
- North Macedonia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between North Macedonia and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uganda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Uganda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- North Macedonia ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.