Serbia and Montenegro vs Uganda: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Serbia and Montenegro
0 ha
in 2005
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
56th
Uganda rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Uganda
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.21 ha | 41,280 ha | 41,224 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 7.69 ha | 4,502 ha | 4,494 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Serbia and Montenegro or Uganda?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2005.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Serbia and Montenegro and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Uganda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Uganda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.