Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Sudan
10,480 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
14,979 ha
in 2024
Sudan rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
16th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 14,979 ha against 10,480 ha in Sudan, a difference of 4,499 ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 219 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,837 ha | 67,908 ha | 66,071 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4,406 ha | 20,325 ha | 15,919 ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 14,979 ha against 10,480 ha in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 4,499 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Sudan ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 16th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.