Sweden vs Uganda: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Sweden
0 ha
in 2024
Uganda
0 ha
in 2024
Sweden rank
56th
Uganda rank
56th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time
- Sweden
- Uganda
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.55 ha | 35,520 ha | 35,514 ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 2,710 ha | 2,710 ha | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 23.51 ha | 23.51 ha | Uganda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 8.55 ha | 8.55 ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Sweden or Uganda?
- Sweden, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Sweden and Uganda?
- 0 ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sweden and Uganda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
- Sweden ranks 56th and Uganda ranks 56th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.