Belarus vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Belarus
0 ha per person
in 2024
Norway
0 ha per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
51st
Norway rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Belarus
- Norway
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Norway ahead.
Belarus ranks 51st and Norway ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Norway |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Belarus or Norway?
- Belarus, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Belarus and Norway?
- 0 ha per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Norway?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Norway rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 51st and Norway ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.