Costa Rica vs Gambia: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Costa Rica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Gambia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
51st
Gambia rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Costa Rica
- Gambia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Gambia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 51st and Gambia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0061 ha per person | 0.0061 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Costa Rica or Gambia?
- Costa Rica, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Costa Rica and Gambia?
- 0 ha per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Gambia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Gambia rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 51st and Gambia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.