Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)

Costa Rica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 ha per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
51st
Papua New Guinea rank
51st

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Papua New Guinea
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003199020072024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 ha per person.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 51st and Papua New Guinea ranks 51st of 186 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0 ha per person 0.0005 ha per person 0.0005 ha per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0 ha per person 0 ha per person 0 ha per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 ha per person 0 ha per person 0 ha per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 ha per person 0 ha per person 0 ha per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Costa Rica or Papua New Guinea?
Costa Rica, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
0 ha per person, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
Costa Rica ranks 51st and Papua New Guinea ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-per-capita/costa-rica/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-per-capita/costa-rica/papua-new-guinea/">Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita
Unit
ha per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,399 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.