Denmark vs Libya: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Denmark
0 ha per person
in 2024
Libya
0 ha per person
in 2024
Denmark rank
51st
Libya rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Denmark
- Libya
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Libya, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Denmark ranks 51st and Libya ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Denmark or Libya?
- Denmark, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Denmark and Libya?
- 0 ha per person, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Libya rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Denmark ranks 51st and Libya ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.