Denmark vs Norway: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Denmark
0 ha per person
in 2024
Norway
0 ha per person
in 2024
Denmark rank
51st
Norway rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Denmark
- Norway
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 51st and Norway ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Norway |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Denmark or Norway?
- Denmark, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Denmark and Norway?
- 0 ha per person, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Norway rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Denmark ranks 51st and Norway ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.