Egypt vs Rwanda: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
49th
Rwanda rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Egypt
- Rwanda
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Egypt ranks 49th and Rwanda ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Rwanda?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Rwanda?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Rwanda rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 49th and Rwanda ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.