Fiji vs Iceland: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Fiji
0 ha per person
in 2024
Iceland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Fiji rank
51st
Iceland rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Fiji
- Iceland
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Iceland, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 51st and Iceland ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Fiji or Iceland?
- Fiji, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Fiji and Iceland?
- 0 ha per person, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Iceland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Iceland rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Fiji ranks 51st and Iceland ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.