Iceland vs Togo: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Iceland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Togo
0 ha per person
in 2024
Iceland rank
51st
Togo rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Iceland
- Togo
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Togo, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 51st and Togo ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | Togo |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Iceland or Togo?
- Iceland, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Iceland and Togo?
- 0 ha per person, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Togo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Togo rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Iceland ranks 51st and Togo ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.