Japan vs Kuwait: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Japan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kuwait
0 ha per person
in 2024
Japan rank
51st
Kuwait rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Japan
- Kuwait
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kuwait, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kuwait ahead.
Japan ranks 51st and Kuwait ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Kuwait in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Japan or Kuwait?
- Japan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Kuwait as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Japan and Kuwait?
- 0 ha per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kuwait?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Kuwait rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Japan ranks 51st and Kuwait ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.