Japan vs Sweden: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Japan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sweden
0 ha per person
in 2024
Japan rank
51st
Sweden rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Japan
- Sweden
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Japan ranks 51st and Sweden ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Japan or Sweden?
- Japan, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Japan and Sweden?
- 0 ha per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Sweden rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Japan ranks 51st and Sweden ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.