Kuwait vs Libya: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Kuwait
0 ha per person
in 2024
Libya
0 ha per person
in 2024
Kuwait rank
51st
Libya rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Kuwait
- Libya
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Libya, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 51st and Libya ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Kuwait or Libya?
- Kuwait, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Kuwait and Libya?
- 0 ha per person, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Kuwait and Libya rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Kuwait ranks 51st and Libya ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.