Libya vs South Sudan: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Libya
0 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Libya rank
51st
South Sudan rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Libya
- South Sudan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Libya ranks 51st and South Sudan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Libya or South Sudan?
- Libya, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Libya and South Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Libya and South Sudan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Libya ranks 51st and South Sudan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.