Lithuania vs Sri Lanka: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Lithuania
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
51st
Sri Lanka rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Lithuania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Lithuania or Sri Lanka?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sri Lanka?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Sri Lanka rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.