Poland vs Romania: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Poland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Romania
0 ha per person
in 2024
Poland rank
51st
Romania rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Poland
- Romania
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Romania, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 51st and Romania ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Romania |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Romania |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Poland or Romania?
- Poland, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Poland and Romania?
- 0 ha per person, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Romania rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Poland ranks 51st and Romania ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.