Puerto Rico vs South Sudan: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area)
Puerto Rico
0 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico rank
51st
South Sudan rank
51st
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita (capita Area) over time
- Puerto Rico
- South Sudan
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 51st and South Sudan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita, Puerto Rico or South Sudan?
- Puerto Rico, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita between Puerto Rico and South Sudan?
- 0 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Puerto Rico and South Sudan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per capita?
- Puerto Rico ranks 51st and South Sudan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.