Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area)

Costa Rica
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
56th
Papua New Guinea rank
56th

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Papua New Guinea
00.010.020.03199020062023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 56th and Papua New Guinea ranks 56th of 186 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0017 ha per square kilometre 0.0053 ha per square kilometre 0.0037 ha per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0004 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 ha per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre 0 ha per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Papua New Guinea?
Costa Rica, at 0 ha per square kilometre against 0 ha per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
0 ha per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 56th and Papua New Guinea ranks 56th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/papua-new-guinea/">Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,213 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.