Eswatini vs Sudan: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP)
Eswatini
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eswatini rank
13th
Sudan rank
14th
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 14th of 183 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 14th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.