Armenia vs Uruguay: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Armenia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Uruguay
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Armenia rank
54th
Uruguay rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Armenia
  • Uruguay
-1000100200199120072023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uruguay ahead.

Armenia ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 4.68 % change on previous year 57.06 % change on previous year 52.38 % change on previous year Uruguay
2000s -95.11 % change on previous year -18.36 % change on previous year 76.75 % change on previous year Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Armenia or Uruguay?
Armenia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Armenia and Uruguay?
0 % change on previous year, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
8 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2001.
How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Armenia ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Uruguay: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/armenia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/armenia/uruguay/">Armenia vs Uruguay: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.