Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Burkina Faso
-100 % change on previous year
in 2002
Kazakhstan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
54th
Kazakhstan rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Kazakhstan
-2000200400199120072023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Kazakhstan ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 34.19 % change on previous year 60.89 % change on previous year 26.69 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2000s -53.74 % change on previous year -69.14 % change on previous year 15.39 % change on previous year Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Burkina Faso or Kazakhstan?
Burkina Faso, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan as of 2002.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
0 % change on previous year, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan?
10 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2002.
How do Burkina Faso and Kazakhstan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Kazakhstan ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/burkina-faso/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/burkina-faso/kazakhstan/">Burkina Faso vs Kazakhstan: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.