Chile vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Chile
-63.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-63.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chile rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
42nd

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Chile currently reports -63.06 % change on previous year against -63.5 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.44 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Chile ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 15.94 % change on previous year -8.92 % change on previous year 24.86 % change on previous year Chile
2000s 39.52 % change on previous year -4.79 % change on previous year 44.31 % change on previous year Chile
2010s 88.27 % change on previous year 18.98 % change on previous year 69.29 % change on previous year Chile
2020s -4.43 % change on previous year 15.57 % change on previous year 20 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Chile or Zimbabwe?
Chile, at -63.06 % change on previous year against -63.5 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Chile and Zimbabwe?
0.44 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Chile ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.