China vs Jordan: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

China
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Jordan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
China rank
54th
Jordan rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • China
  • Jordan
-2000200400600800199120072023

How they compare

China currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Jordan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Jordan ahead.

China ranks 54th and Jordan ranks 54th of 167 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 53.64 % change on previous year 31.27 % change on previous year 22.37 % change on previous year China
2000s -1.71 % change on previous year -86.93 % change on previous year 85.22 % change on previous year China
2010s -96.85 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 3.15 % change on previous year China
2020s 701.96 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 801.96 % change on previous year China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), China or Jordan?
China, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between China and Jordan?
0 % change on previous year, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jordan?
14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do China and Jordan rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
China ranks 54th and Jordan ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Jordan: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/china/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/china/jordan/">China vs Jordan: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.