Cuba vs Finland: Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate

Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Finland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Cuba rank
54th
Finland rank
54th

Closed and open shrubland … Burning annual growth rate over time

  • Cuba
  • Finland
-2000200400199120072024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Finland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Finland ahead.

Cuba ranks 54th and Finland ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 71.59 % change on previous year 16.46 % change on previous year 55.13 % change on previous year Cuba
2000s -67.59 % change on previous year -42.68 % change on previous year 24.9 % change on previous year Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Cuba or Finland?
Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Cuba and Finland?
0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Cuba ranks 54th and Finland ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Finland: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/cuba/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth/cuba/finland/">Cuba vs Finland: Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 4,236 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed and open shrubland — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.